homepage logo


By Staff | Jan 13, 2017

At this time most of 2017 lays in front of us. We can all hope that most of the efforts we apply this new year will be rewarded personally and financially.

2016 was where much of the country seemed to be tumultuous based on ag economics, foreign markets, weather fears/hopes and national politics. Now as long as people on one side recognize many things will be improved and the economy and society is headed in a better direction now that we have elected a leader, we can proverably “pull on the same end of the rope” again.

John Kennedy realized that and in his inaugural speech and with his announced space race got the people in the country organized in thoughts and efforts. Hopefully this will happen.

Winter-wise when was the last time that most of us have not had to plow snow through mid-January? It has definitely been cold, with bitter wind chills, but not having to spend time moving snow has sure seemed nice. While growing up and having to do chores and do all the outdoor tasks my father’s advice was always, if you were getting cold, work harder and you will warm up.

That was in the days of outdoor-raised hogs and before Thinsulate. Nowadays with more heated shops and improved clothing cold temps are more bearable.

Dissecting high yields

High crop yields are what growers typically strive for. They sell their produce by the bushel or the head so by increasing yields while keeping track of and controlling input costs the economics are improved.

For this reason growers are always looking for and wanting to quiz yield contest winners to hear their secrets. Guys like Randy Dowdy get grouped with Kip Cullers and Ray Rawson to act as messiahs to help push yield boundaries and delve into areas of products and management that other growers have not explored.

I have previously mentioned that in working with a friend and ag professional on his farm just west of Guthrie Center, and other individuals across the state, we were seeking high corn yields in 2016. When we combined different products on a 31-45 CSR field we managed to raise corn yields into the 280 to 340 bushel-per-acre range.

Now the challenge is to dissect the season and system and figure out what inputs or soil parameters were responsible for the good results. In a scientific experiment only one variable is changed, so its effect can be measured. But in the real world and actual field growers will usually change several things if each of those individually make sense.

With the use of stabilized nutrition (N with Nutri-Sphere and P with Avail) that were row-placed and broadcast and timed more to plant use, futuristic signaling compounds like “Take Off” that promote nutrient scavenging and efficient utilization, and ultimate disease control (for both bacteria and fungi with a BioEmpruv mix) that kept the corn plants green through late October, the yields were extremely good.

In most cases where the grain is dumped in the cart and bin that is the end the story.

In this case we saved ears off the Guthrie County and other farms and it was time to do more analyses. So now the ears, which showed no tip-back and most had kernels that went up and over the end of the ear, were dissected with kernels being pulled out each inch of the ear and were analyzed for the full spectrum of minerals with an X-Ray defraction instrument to see what mineral component differences existed in the kernels from the butt to the middle to the top of the ear.

The thought was that when mineral availability tapered off due to lack of those minerals within the root zone, inadequate soil biology to convert the insoluble fertility to the reduced/available form, or adequate plant health to keep the plant pumping out sugars, the kernels analyses would show when and where and which deficiencies had occurred.

Pictures of this dissection and footage of the work was captured and soon the action and graphs of the findings presented in a 30-minute video in the very near future on our website www.centraliowaag.com.

We were able to get the participation in this project by several of the top scientists in the country. Four PhDs from M.I.T. and several from other major universities were involved and all of them have lots of hands-on field experience. You will recognize most of them when you watch the video.

In addition soil samples were pulled every month and analyzed using the traditional methods and run through the Haney analyses. Thus the biological components were grouped into either fungal or bacterial categories as well as the micro-fauna as to whether they were amoeba (blobs), flagellates (flippers) or ciliates (finned). The samples were given an overall Haney score.

Different types of N stabilizers were tested with the results graphed and the differences were remarkable. Some lowered the Haney scores dramatically while others raised them. Growers who hope to march up the yield ladder, and stay price competitive may want to try to duplicate the program that was used here.

A number of those farmers are likely to attend the upcoming ISU Extension Soil Health conference scheduled for late February. They will want to hear what practices and products are best for improving the soil and production scheme and hopefully which ones are harmful and should be weaned away from.

After we get all the analytic results I hope to show them to the Soil Lab director as well as other seasoned ag experts and tease out what ideas are most important and should be expanded. As someone who sees major soil loss problems and depletion of nutrients in the soil bank, giving guidance on how to restore soil productivity and its needed biological activity, getting such work done to help growers stay on the right path is important.

Some of the thought process behind the intense grain analysis comes from growing up around hogs and other large-littered meat animals. When the sows runs out of dietary and stored energy and minerals half way through the gestation, and produce 10 baby pigs, number 8, 9 and 10 are often runts being they were on the end of the umbilical cord and food supply. The runtiness stays with them throughout their lives and ends up costing money.

Now if the corn or soybean plant runs out of nutrition half way through the grain fill, it makes sense that the last formed kernels and seed will be smaller with fewer nutrients in them. Now with the quick, non-prep, real-time ability of the x-ray defraction equipment farmers and seed producers will be able to test first versus last formed grain to track mineral levels and manage the crop for optimum fertility.

Running out of minerals and energy could explain emergence, low seedling vigor and early disease susceptibility issues seen in recent seasons.

Soil test results

Now is when many farmers have time and the need to go over the results of last fall’s soil sampling done on their farms. From what I have seen too many of the analytical report results are still short of what is needed to figure out what needs to be done to correct problems.

Too many are missing base saturation and any micronutrient testing. I still like to see every third or so of soil samples tested for micros. Then if any red flags are raised on the third there is typically three weeks where the samples are shelved in case there are requests to rerun them for additional tests.

If there will be no more dry spreader passes made before the planting season the appropriate method of applying zinc would be to go in furrow application of chelated zinc. Ditto for the molybdenum, which more samples are never tested for but should.

Since boron can get hot and burn root tissue it is best applied with a foliar application. The same applies for copper and manganese since they are ending up being short in tissue testing a high percent of the time.

ISU Crop seminars

Another meeting series being held the next few weeks across the state are the Crop Advantage seminars. Check with a local Extension office to see when the one in your area is scheduled.

Bob Streit is an independent crop consultant and columnist for Farm News. He can be reached at (515) 709-0143 or www.CentralIowaAg.com.

Please Enter Your Facebook App ID. Required for FB Comments. Click here for FB Comments Settings page